On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:05 PM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
> Where in fact, any address today can be used as an EID-prefix by simply
> allowing an xTR to look it up (the configuration knob above is not set) to
> determine if there are xTRs at the site. This is why I keep saying there is
> no requirement for RIRs to allocate EID-prefixes.
Dino -
Presuming the EID block were issued, would the "EIDs are in f00/12" knob
be a site-local setting or would it be the default for EID architecture?
One of interesting aspects of EID space is its overlap with IPv6 space,
and hence I was wondering if the long-term plans are for formally disjoint
spaces? (Absent that, issuance of EID prefixes implies issuance of IPv6
space, which has some policy implications for the existing address
registry system, and is probably why several folks on the list keep
noting the need to liaison with the ISP community via the RIRs...)
/John
Disclaimers: My views alone. Headers are not to be removed
except by final consumer.
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
