On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:40:43 -0800, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> Is there a way to structure things with unified, automated, assignment now,
> but the ability to split along this and other dimensions later? (We don't
> even need to spell out the split, just be confident we can do it if we want
> to.
This particular approach looks to be the worst of all worlds, in that you'll
have
a deployed solution which requires significant effort and coordination to
handle
the split, and no clear reason to actually make the changes since everyone is
just fine with interim state (hmm...kinda like the first 15 years of IPng ;-)
If the requirements for doing this call for a registry/registrar split, and
it's likely
that whatever we're about deploy will end up in permanent use, why wouldn't we
specify it correctly up-front? (i.e. back to my earlier question: is there
some
imminent failure of the present LISP Beta solution for issuing EID prefixes
that
precludes taking the time to do this right?)
/John
Disclaimers: My views alone. No parameter fields were harmed in the making
of this email.
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
