Am 2013-10-30 16:31, schrieb Luigi Iannone:
Hi All,

I was thinking that may be it is worth to (re)open the discussion
about the EID block size.

Currently we are requesting a /16 and asking to reserve the /12
covering it. This was the outcome from the WG consensus, hence, it has
not been changed in the document.

Yet, one of the main critics during the review was about the size of
the block which seems too large.

Any thought about a change in the requested EID block size?

Should we keep it as it is?
Should we shrink it? How much?


To which document are you referring? draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-06.txt proposes /16 with /12 reserved.

Having the possibility to establish global, provider-independant network-roaming for consumers with LISP, a /16 with 2^32 /48 will not suffice for each natural person on this planet. We already will have to assign /56 to natural persons and bigger prefixes to corporate entities with /16 only.

In fact I'm already considering the requirements for global, provider-independant network-roaming for consumers. In short:

1. Assignments of EID-prefixes should for lifetime, provider-independent and remain in force when EID-prefix-bearers change the RIR region. 2. Each natural person can register ONE /56 EID block (256 possible /64 subnets should suffice for a natural person). 3. Corporate entities can register a reasonable EID-prefix based on their size, infrastructure and expected growth. 4. LIRs can charge a reasonable fee once but MUST NOT recharge fees. The fee should be low enough to allow any natural person to register a EID-prefix. 5. Bearer of EID-prefixes can select any Map Server service or run it themselves to encourage reasonable fees by competition.

And I think /16 is a good start. If LISP fails, the /16 will be usable again in 6 years. If it succeeds, IANA will have to hurry assigning the /12 block! ;-)

AVM-routers will provide LISP-clients for 50% of the german and 20% of the european internet-sockets until end of the year. LISPmob provides support for Linux and Android (although Android still requires rooting).

Regards,

Renne

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to