Hi Geoff, > BGP is a huge success - it appears to route 100% of the address space. If > LISP > becomes a huge success then why wouldn't it route 100% of the address space, > just > as BGP does today? And if it withers and dies then any dedicated address > allocation will be too much at that point in time. If this is all about an > _experiment_ under some form of experimental constraint then what are the > bounds of the experiment? What happens at the end of the experiment? Why > would there > be a continuing need to corral LISP into its own dedicated corner of the > address > space? Is there something about scaling LISP to a full unicast routing scale > that > simply does not work? Or is corralling of LISP into a dedicated block of > addresses > unnecessary? Why do I feel that this experiment has not been well thought > through? > Or if it has, then it seems to me that the mapping of parameters of the > proposed > experiment into the words in the two drafts relating to this proposed action > is still lacking.
This pretty much sums up my feelings about those drafts as well. Thanks :-) Sander _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
