> From: Luigi Iannone <[email protected]>
> Yet, one of the main critics during the review was about the size of
> the block which seems too large.
System Architecture Rule #1:
Any Fixed-Size Namespace Will Eventually Be Too Small
Given that a /12 represents .025% of the IPv6 namespace, _if_ LISP becomes a
huge sucess, we're more likely to run into SAR #1; and if LISP does not
become etc, are they really going to miss .025% of a namespace?
> Any thought about a change in the requested EID block size?
I think we got it right the first time.
Noel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
