> I'll explain one experiment and will be crystal ear about it. > > (1) We want to have a LISP site send to both LISP sites and not LISP sites. > (2) We want an ITR to do mapping database lookups when the destination > address is an EID. > (3) We want the ITR to forward packet s by doing a traditional FIB lookup > when the destination is not an EID.
I understand what the technical idea is. There are already EIDs out there (including my own network) that are not in any special prefix. Therefore "address is in special prefix" != "address is an EID". Unless you break LISP for already existing sites I don't see how having a special prefix is going to help in (correctly) determining whether an address is an EID. > Good Zen? Sorry, still not (yet?) liking this idea. Sander _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
