Hi, On 31 Oct. 2013, at 09:31 , Sander Steffann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'll explain one experiment and will be crystal ear about it. >> >> (1) We want to have a LISP site send to both LISP sites and not LISP sites. >> (2) We want an ITR to do mapping database lookups when the destination >> address is an EID. >> (3) We want the ITR to forward packet s by doing a traditional FIB lookup >> when the destination is not an EID. > > I understand what the technical idea is. There are already EIDs out there > (including my own network) that are not in any special prefix. Therefore > "address is in special prefix" != "address is an EID”. That is not correct. With an EID block you would have: Address in special prefix == address is an EID Address not in special prefix != is not an EID Basically if it is n the special block you know it is an EID, if it is not in the special block you have no idea and you have to check. Luigi > Unless you break LISP for already existing sites I don't see how having a > special prefix is going to help in (correctly) determining whether an address > is an EID. > >> Good Zen? > > Sorry, still not (yet?) liking this idea. > Sander > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
