On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Sander Steffann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > >> We see just this (peering) happening between LISP Service Providers in the >> US now. > > What exactly do you mean with 'peering' in this context? If a given PxTR provider is responsible for originating EID prefixes into the DFZ on behalf of their subscribers (LISP Mapping and Proxy services customers) want to widen their footprint/capacity of transit of Proxy-ITRs, they can agree to exchange these EID-prefixes and announce them on each other's behalf. So if LISP Mapping/Proxy Provider Foo is originating 172.16.1.0/20 and LISP Mapping/Proxy Provider Bar is originating 10.1.1.0/22, and they come to an bilateral agreement to share Proxy-ITR capacity they can agree to peer (via, for example, eBGP multi-hop) and propagate the prefixes that that the other is originating. Note that the origin AS for these two EID prefixes remains Foo and Bar's respectively. Today some providers are redistributing registered EID prefixes directly via their map-servers, and some are using static routes independent of redistribution for origination. (I prefer the latter, but YMMV.) -Darrel _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
