It may be minor, but the last sentence in section 4 is unclear. The txt I see
is:
----------------
The prefix must not be used as normal prefix and announced in the BGP
routing infrastructure.
in the BGP
routing infrastructure.
---------------
There is some error in the markup processing used to generate this draft, but
the more
substantive comment is that I can't clearly parse the sentence.
Did the authors mean:
a) The prefix must not be used as normal prefix and must not be announced in
the BGP
routing infrastructure.
or
b) The prefix must not be used as normal prefix but will (must?) be announced
in the BGP
routing infrastructure.
or
c) something else
I would prefer to see this resolved before saying "we're done!" which I
suppose is a
"NO" response to the WGLC at this stage.
regards,
Geoff
On 29 Nov 2013, at 12:39 pm, Terry Manderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> All,
>
> As requested in Vancouver, and after the authors updated the draft (to
> -07) based on the Vancouver in-room discussion.
>
> This starts a 14 day last call for this document, the last call will end
> on Friday the 13th December 2013.
>
> You will find its text here:
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-07.txt
>
> Please review this WG item and provide any last comments.
>
> Cheers
> Terry
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
