> Luigi, > > Is this really what is going to happen? > > If a PITR announces the entire /32 into the global Internet, it puts itself > on the forwarding path for the entire /32, and incurs the cost associated > with transporting traffic towards every site in that /32. This is supportable > only if the PITR operator is somehow compensated for carrying all of that > traffic.
But maybe only from a few sources. But if the /32 needs to be divided based on region, then maybe /40s could be advertised. But to the point about "few sources", the more PITRs there are, the better the load is shared. And I envision PITRs will be deployed on on-path boxes anyways. Those boxes right now can route to the entire Internet, they are called PE boxes, are they not Ron? > Isn't it more likely that the PITR operator will advertise only slices of the > /32, with each of those slices being assigned to either its customers (from > whom it collects revenue) or the customers of other operators with whom it > has made financial arrangements? No it won't be that way. EIDs are provider independent. If you do what we suggest, we make no forward progress. Dino > > Ron > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
