On 12/4/13 10:26 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote: >> >> PITR should announce the largest aggregate possible, ideally the >> /32. >> > > Luigi, > > Is this really what is going to happen? >
The above is why I explicitly mentioned the pain felt by 6to4 relay routers during the Vancouver meeting. Advertising the entire range is not a good idea. > If a PITR announces the entire /32 into the global Internet, it puts > itself on the forwarding path for the entire /32, and incurs the cost > associated with transporting traffic towards every site in that /32. > This is supportable only if the PITR operator is somehow compensated > for carrying all of that traffic. > > Isn't it more likely that the PITR operator will advertise only > slices of the /32, with each of those slices being assigned to either > its customers (from whom it collects revenue) or the customers of > other operators with whom it has made financial arrangements? I would hope this would be the case. Regards, Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
