> This draft seems to expect that IPSec tunnels will be set up by means outside > of LISP. That seems to contravene the premise of LISp that it can operate > without needing permanent / pre-established tunnel state. > > Should this be tied to the work Dino described at the last IETF meeting on > using LISP to establish encryption for the LISP tunnel?
FYI, my draft on data-plane crypto is coming. Dino > > Yours, > Joel > > On 2/12/14, 6:22 AM, Santiago Freitas (safreita) wrote: >> Hi LISP Working Group, >> >> Today we have submitted a draft that covers using LISP for Secure Hybrid >> Cloud Extension. >> >> The draft can be found at >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-freitas-bellagamba-lisp-hybrid-cloud-usecase-00.txt >> >> We would like to request your comments on it. >> >> Also, we would like request a small slot on the upcoming IETF 89 meeting >> to present an overview of the use case covered on the draft. >> >> We look forward to your comments and for your feedback if we can have a >> small slot to present an overview of this draft on IETF 89. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Patrice and Santiago >> > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
