+1 The main goal of the document is to introduce LISP, we should avoid comparisons.
Albert On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Victor Moreno (vimoreno) <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > I am however interested in the comparison, but I don't see it as part of an > introduction or other lisp specification document > Victor > >> On Aug 11, 2014, at 4:33 PM, "Dino Farinacci" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We should not compare LISP to any other protocol. We should define what LISP >> is. BGP and LISP solve different problems. >> >> Dino >> >>> On Aug 11, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Darrel, >>> >>> Clearly, this is a WG document and the entire WG gets a chance to review, >>> accept or reject a contribution. That goes without saying for any document. >>> >>> >>> Ron >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Darrel Lewis (darlewis) [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 7:10 PM >>>> To: Ronald Bonica >>>> Cc: Darrel Lewis (darlewis); Dino Farinacci; LISP mailing list list >>>> Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-04 (Part 3) >>>> >>>> <Doing the same> >>>> >>>> I mentioned that I'd want to see the text before supporting (or opposing) >>>> its >>>> inclusion... So adding sections seems somewhat premature. >>>> >>>> >>>> -D >>>>> On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <This time adding the folks who I dropped accidentally> >>>>> >>>>> Darrel, >>>>> >>>>> Fair enough. >>>>> >>>>> Could the editors leave an empty section between the sections that are >>>> now numbered 6.4 and 6.5. The Title of that section is "Differences Between >>>> LISP and BGP". I will provide text within the next week or so. >>>>> >>>>> Ron >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Darrel Lewis (darlewis) [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 1:29 PM >>>>>> To: Ronald Bonica >>>>>> Cc: Darrel Lewis (darlewis); Dino Farinacci; LISP mailing list list >>>>>> Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-04 (Part 3) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In order to help the reader understand the difference between LISP >>>>>>> and >>>>>> BGP, it might be a good idea to add a few pages that compare and >>>>>> contrast the two. It should answer the following questions: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - In BGP, how does the producer of a route know that it is time to >>>>>>> push it >>>>>>> - In LISP, how does the consumer of a route know that it is time to >>>>>>> pull it >>>>>>> - In BGP, what happens when the control path between the producer >>>>>>> and >>>>>> consumer of a route becomes degraded or unusable >>>>>>> - In LISP, what happens when the control path between the producer >>>>>>> and >>>>>> consumer of a route becomes degraded or unusable >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ron >>>>>> >>>>>> I eagerly await your suggested text. >>>>>> >>>>>> -D >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
