As a personal opinion, I tend to agree with Dino. It might be better to compare pull vs push model without the specifics of BGP (or nay other push-based solution).
Independently from whether we compare vs BGP or not, it is still worth to have such discussion in the document IMHO. Luigi On 12 Aug 2014, at 01:32, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > We should not compare LISP to any other protocol. We should define what LISP > is. BGP and LISP solve different problems. > > Dino > > On Aug 11, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Darrel, >> >> Clearly, this is a WG document and the entire WG gets a chance to review, >> accept or reject a contribution. That goes without saying for any document. >> >> >> Ron >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Darrel Lewis (darlewis) [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 7:10 PM >>> To: Ronald Bonica >>> Cc: Darrel Lewis (darlewis); Dino Farinacci; LISP mailing list list >>> Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-04 (Part 3) >>> >>> <Doing the same> >>> >>> I mentioned that I'd want to see the text before supporting (or opposing) >>> its >>> inclusion... So adding sections seems somewhat premature. >>> >>> >>> -D >>> On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> <This time adding the folks who I dropped accidentally> >>>> >>>> Darrel, >>>> >>>> Fair enough. >>>> >>>> Could the editors leave an empty section between the sections that are >>> now numbered 6.4 and 6.5. The Title of that section is "Differences Between >>> LISP and BGP". I will provide text within the next week or so. >>>> >>>> Ron >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Darrel Lewis (darlewis) [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 1:29 PM >>>>> To: Ronald Bonica >>>>> Cc: Darrel Lewis (darlewis); Dino Farinacci; LISP mailing list list >>>>> Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-04 (Part 3) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In order to help the reader understand the difference between LISP >>>>>> and >>>>> BGP, it might be a good idea to add a few pages that compare and >>>>> contrast the two. It should answer the following questions: >>>>>> >>>>>> - In BGP, how does the producer of a route know that it is time to >>>>>> push it >>>>>> - In LISP, how does the consumer of a route know that it is time to >>>>>> pull it >>>>>> - In BGP, what happens when the control path between the producer >>>>>> and >>>>> consumer of a route becomes degraded or unusable >>>>>> - In LISP, what happens when the control path between the producer >>>>>> and >>>>> consumer of a route becomes degraded or unusable >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ron >>>>> >>>>> I eagerly await your suggested text. >>>>> >>>>> -D >> > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
