Sorted based on AFI. Which means LCAF/Type when multiple LCAF encodings occur. So if an locator-set had these addresses, they would be sorted in the following order:
AFI=1, <ipv4-address> AFI=2, <ipv6-address> AFI=16387, LCAF-type=5, <geo-coordinates> AFI=16387, LCAF-type=10, <elp> Dino On Sep 30, 2014, at 8:50 AM, Albert López <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > We have seen that, according to RFC 6830, the locators appearing in a Map > Reply must be "sorted in order of ascending IP address where an IPv4 locator > address is considered numerically 'less than' an IPv6 locator address". How > should the locators be sorted if we also have LCAF addresses like ELP? > > Best regards > > Albert > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
