Dino,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer. If there are more than one of the same LCAF type
> addresses, how are then the locators sorted? For instance two different ELP
> locators.
>
> I will document that within a AFI/LCAF-Type, they should be sorted based
> on the inner AFI value.
>
> > May be it could be interesting to have sorting information for each LCAF
> type, at least for the ones that could be used as locators.
>
> Well within a single RLOC-record, there is one LCAF and that is used in
> its entirety so there is no selection of some information versus the
> others. Assuming the receiver can parse the entire LCAF Type.
>
> Dino
>
Just to clarify. Consider a Map-Reply message that conveys the following
two ELPs as locators for a single EID-Record:
AFI=16387, LCAF-type=10, {1st re-encap hop: 5.5.5.5, 2nd re-encap hop:
4444::4444 }
AFI=16387, LCAF-type=10, {1st re-encap hop: 1111::1111, 2nd re-encap hop:
3.3.3.3}
Which ELP should appear first?
Thanks,
Alberto
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
