Is this be written down somewhere? Should it be? (In the LCAF spec maybe?)
Yours,
Joel
On 9/30/14, 11:54 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
Sorted based on AFI. Which means LCAF/Type when multiple LCAF encodings occur.
So if an locator-set had these addresses, they would be sorted in the following
order:
AFI=1, <ipv4-address>
AFI=2, <ipv6-address>
AFI=16387, LCAF-type=5, <geo-coordinates>
AFI=16387, LCAF-type=10, <elp>
Dino
On Sep 30, 2014, at 8:50 AM, Albert López <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear all,
We have seen that, according to RFC 6830, the locators appearing in a Map Reply must be
"sorted in order of ascending IP address where an IPv4 locator address is considered
numerically 'less than' an IPv6 locator address". How should the locators be sorted
if we also have LCAF addresses like ELP?
Best regards
Albert
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
