Dino,

what you write make sense, but let me invite the WG to discuss more on the 
first _IF_ of your logic: “if NVO3 …".

As I pointed out in another mail, we need more discussion on what we are going 
to support.

We cannot write a charter that states “LISP will support NVO3 use-cases”.

L.

> On 16 Aug 2015, at 00:03, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> The logic follows like this:
> 
> If NVo3 is a requirement for the recharter, then L2 overlay support is 
> required. If L2 overlay support is required, then you must stretch subnets. 
> If you stretch subnets, broadcast frame support is required. If broadcast 
> frame support is needed, then multicast support on the overlay is needed. 
> 
> And if L2 overlays are going to be supported in cloud environments, homenet, 
> or in containers, then NAT-traversal support is required. 
> 
> Dino
> 
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Damien Saucez <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I understand that multicast and nat traversal are potentially required in 
>> all use cases, but the "must support" sounds extreme to me. Are they 
>> hypothetical requirements or real demand from the market targeted by LISP, 
>> new version ?
>> 
>> Damien Saucez 
>> 
>> On 12 Aug 2015, at 19:44, Stig Venaas <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 12, 2015 10:22 AM, "Dino Farinacci" <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Yes, where but multicast sources as well as multicast receivers are 
>>> > moving. There are severl military applications for this use-case.
>>> 
>>> Agree
>>> 
>>> Stig
>>> 
>>> >
>>> > Dino
>>> >
>>> > > On Aug 12, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Stig Venaas <[email protected] 
>>> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > I agree we need to consider multicast. There are people that want to do 
>>> > > multicast over LISP. Some are already doing it. This also includes 
>>> > > mobility.
>>> > >
>>> > > Stig
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp 
>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to