> On 25 Aug 2015, at 19:02, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We cannot write a charter that states “LISP will support NVO3 use-cases”. > > How about this specific text: > > For the NVo3 use-case, LISP will support L2-overlays by selecting a > data-plane that supports encapsulation of MAC frames in IPv4 or IPv6 packets > and by using the mapping database that supports (instance-ID, MAC-address) > extended-EIDs. >
Better… but I personally (no hats on) would prefer an tighter charter with a more precise list milestones. May be the overlay model thread will give us such list ;-) L. > Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
