As a side note, RIPE NCC already implemented the registration service. They 
only wait for the two I-Ds to become RFC in order to start handing out prefixes.

ciao

L.

> On 18 Feb 2016, at 01:26, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> HI Terry,
> 
> would be possible to have more information?
> 
> The latest email from IANA, dated 2nd February said:
> 
>> (BEGIN IANA COMMENTS)
>> 
>> IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:
>> 
>> IANA has completed its review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06.txt. If 
>> any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. 
>> 
>> IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single 
>> action which IANA must complete.
>> 
>> IANA understands that there is an operational requirement for an EID 
>> registration service that ensures uniqueness of EIDs according to the 
>> requirements described in Section 5 of the current document. Furthermore, 
>> there is an operational requirement for EID registration service that allows 
>> a lookup of the contact information of the entity that registered the EID.
>> 
>> IANA further understands that RIPE NCC has agreed to run both the 
>> registration service documented in this draft for the duration of the 
>> experiment.
>> 
>> IANA understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon 
>> approval of this document.
>> 
>> Note:  The actions requested in this document will not be completed until 
>> the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is 
>> only to confirm what actions will be performed.  
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Sabrina Tanamal
>> IANA Specialist
>> ICANN
>> 
>> (END IANA COMMENTS)
>> 
> 
> There is no question section in that mail.
> 
> Anything I am missing?
> 
> thanks 
> 
> Luigi
> 
> 
> 
>> On 18 Feb 2016, at 01:04, Terry Manderson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: Discuss
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> This is a DISCUSS on behalf of the IANA who are questioning the clarity
>> of text and construction of the EID registry service.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to