Hi Luigi, On 2/18/16 10:14 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > OK, > > thanks Brian. > > Just to learn how the process is, why there was a previous mail saying > everything was fine? >
There was a mis-communication within IANA that led to a IANA-internal process failure. Brian > thanks > > L. > > >> On 18 Feb 2016, at 13:59, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Luigi, >> To clarify... We got a request from IANA to hold the document since >> they "still need to double-check the IANA Considerations internally for >> this document." >> >> Regards, >> Brian >> >> On 2/17/16 7:26 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: >>> HI Terry, >>> >>> would be possible to have more information? >>> >>> The latest email from IANA, dated 2nd February said: >>> >>>> (BEGIN IANA COMMENTS) >>>> >>>> IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: >>>> >>>> IANA has completed its review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06.txt. >>>> If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. >>>> >>>> IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single >>>> action which IANA must complete. >>>> >>>> IANA understands that there is an operational requirement for an EID >>>> registration service that ensures uniqueness of EIDs according to the >>>> requirements described in Section 5 of the current document. Furthermore, >>>> there is an operational requirement for EID registration service that >>>> allows a lookup of the contact information of the entity that registered >>>> the EID. >>>> >>>> IANA further understands that RIPE NCC has agreed to run both the >>>> registration service documented in this draft for the duration of the >>>> experiment. >>>> >>>> IANA understands that this is the only action required to be completed >>>> upon approval of this document. >>>> >>>> Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until >>>> the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is >>>> only to confirm what actions will be performed. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> >>>> Sabrina Tanamal >>>> IANA Specialist >>>> ICANN >>>> >>>> (END IANA COMMENTS) >>>> >>> >>> There is no question section in that mail. >>> >>> Anything I am missing? >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> Luigi >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 18 Feb 2016, at 01:04, Terry Manderson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for >>>> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: Discuss >>>> >>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >>>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>>> >>>> >>>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>>> >>>> >>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> DISCUSS: >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> This is a DISCUSS on behalf of the IANA who are questioning the clarity >>>> of text and construction of the EID registry service. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
