OK, thanks Brian.
Just to learn how the process is, why there was a previous mail saying everything was fine? thanks L. > On 18 Feb 2016, at 13:59, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Luigi, > To clarify... We got a request from IANA to hold the document since > they "still need to double-check the IANA Considerations internally for > this document." > > Regards, > Brian > > On 2/17/16 7:26 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: >> HI Terry, >> >> would be possible to have more information? >> >> The latest email from IANA, dated 2nd February said: >> >>> (BEGIN IANA COMMENTS) >>> >>> IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: >>> >>> IANA has completed its review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06.txt. If >>> any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. >>> >>> IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single >>> action which IANA must complete. >>> >>> IANA understands that there is an operational requirement for an EID >>> registration service that ensures uniqueness of EIDs according to the >>> requirements described in Section 5 of the current document. Furthermore, >>> there is an operational requirement for EID registration service that >>> allows a lookup of the contact information of the entity that registered >>> the EID. >>> >>> IANA further understands that RIPE NCC has agreed to run both the >>> registration service documented in this draft for the duration of the >>> experiment. >>> >>> IANA understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon >>> approval of this document. >>> >>> Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until >>> the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is >>> only to confirm what actions will be performed. >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Sabrina Tanamal >>> IANA Specialist >>> ICANN >>> >>> (END IANA COMMENTS) >>> >> >> There is no question section in that mail. >> >> Anything I am missing? >> >> thanks >> >> Luigi >> >> >> >>> On 18 Feb 2016, at 01:04, Terry Manderson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for >>> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: Discuss >>> >>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>> >>> >>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>> >>> >>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt/ >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> DISCUSS: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> This is a DISCUSS on behalf of the IANA who are questioning the clarity >>> of text and construction of the EID registry service. >>> >>> >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
