Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-lisp-03-01: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I see: The LISP WG is chartered to continue work on the LISP base protocol and produce standard-track documents (unless the content of the document itself is of a different type, e.g., informational or experimental). And I see a redundant sentence: Documents of these work items will as well target standard-track unless the main content of the document itself clearly demands for a different type (e.g., informational or experimental). In the latter case the Working Group needs to determine the proper document class. I'm afraid that those two sentences are so generic that they don't add anything to the charter. The following sentence is clear though, for the first set of deliverables: In order to produce a coherent set of documents, the first (and high priority) work item of the LISP Working Group is to develop a standard-track solution based on the completed Experimental RFCs and the experience gained from early deployments. As AD, if you know already the track of each of the documents (the ones under "In parallel with the previous main work item, the LISP WG will work on the items listed below:") or want to provide guidance, my advice is to add the milestones and the respected expected status. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netconf/charter/ as an example. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
