Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-lisp-03-01: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm a Yes, with a couple of comments. I don't think "Documents of these work items will as well target standard-track unless the main content of the document itself clearly demands for a different type (e.g., informational or experimental). In the latter case the Working Group needs to determine the proper document class." is quite right. My understanding is that "determining the proper document class" is an IESG responsibility in RFC 2026 (which calls this "publication category"): The IESG is not bound by the action recommended when the specification was submitted. For example, the IESG may decide to consider the specification for publication in a different category than that requested. The fix would be simple enough: "In the latter case the Working Group needs to determine the recommended ^^^^^^^^^^^ document class." I didn't understand this: "The LISP Working Group is chartered to work on the LISP technology, and only use solutions/technology developed in other working groups." Is it saying that the LISP working group will not modify or extend solutions/technology developed in other working groups? Or is something else going on here? _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
