> I'm not that happy with > > "As the architecture is realized, if a given bit string is both an RLOC and > an EID, it must refer to the same entity in both cases". > > In a MESH-architecture the EID of a mobile-node can be the RLOC of a > neighbour mobile-node.
I too would like to understand your comment. What the sentence is trying to achieve is that in some cases an EID and RLOC may be the same value for a given end-node. Like when when an EID is behind a NAT and the xTR is on the public side of the NAT, where the local private EID will be translated to a global EID and to reach the xTR the RLOC is also the same translated address. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
