+1

The LISP implementation in FD.io <http://fd.io/> VPP makes use of it to 
distinguish between Ethernet, IP and NSH payloads. 

Florin

> On Nov 29, 2017, at 10:20 PM, Victor Moreno (vimoreno) <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I’m strongly supportive of this proposal as it completes the necessary 
> specifications to support the L2 services proposed in the eid-mobility draft. 
>  
> 
> Victor
> 
> On Nov 29, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Fabio Maino (fmaino) <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> sounds good.
>> 
>> Fabio
>> 
>> On 11/29/17 3:13 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>> I’d also add before the last sentence:
>>> 
>>> If the N-bit and V-bit are 0 when the P-bit is set, the middle 16-bits are 
>>> set to 0.
>>> 
>>> Dino
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Fabio Maino <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 11/29/17 3:05 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>>>> How about this wording Fabio:
>>>>> 
>>>>> P: The P-bit is the Next Protocol bit. When set, the low-order 8 bits is 
>>>>> used for the Next Protocol field. When the N-bit is also set with the 
>>>>> P-bit, the Nonce field is the middle 16 bits. When the V bit is also set 
>>>>> with the P-bit, the Version field is the middle 16 bits. Details on Next 
>>>>> Protocol field usage are described in [draft-lewis-lisp-gpe].
>>>>> 
>>>>> Comments?
>>>> much better.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Fabio
>>>> 
>>>>> Dino
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 2:49 PM, Fabio Maino <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Definition of the P bit will look like:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    P: The P-bit is the Next Protocol bit. When this bit is set to
>>>>>>       1, Nonce length, when used, is limited to 16 bits and the lenght
>>>>>>       of the Source and Destination Map-Version fields, when used, is 
>>>>>> limited
>>>>>>       to 8 bits. Refer to [draft-lewis-lisp-gpe] for more details.
>>>>>>       The P-bit is set to 1 to indicate the presence of the 8 bit Next 
>>>>>> Protocol field encoded as:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do you think the overall proposed extension makes sense?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Fabio
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 11/29/17 2:38 PM, Fabio Maino wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/29/17 2:36 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The use of the P-bit is not compatible with the Map-Versioning 
>>>>>>>>> feature, but an equivalent function can be specified (if needed) with 
>>>>>>>>> a Next-Protocol shim header. I can add text to the LISP-GPE draft to 
>>>>>>>>> reflect that.
>>>>>>>> Well it could be. Just like you did with the Nonce field. Make the 
>>>>>>>> Version field the middle 16-bits. So V and P can be set at the same as 
>>>>>>>> well as N and P.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dino
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Good point, shortening versions to 8 bits...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Seems fine to me.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Fabio
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp 
>>>>>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp 
>>>>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>
>>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp 
>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to