+1 here too. I can do an implantation so I can interoperate with the other 
implementations. 

Dino

> On Nov 30, 2017, at 2:46 AM, Albert Cabellos <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi all
> 
> Support proposed 6830bis extension.
> 
> This is indeed implmemented in OOR.
> 
> Albert
> 
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Albert López <[email protected]> wrote:
>> +1  
>> 
>> I also support extending RFC 6830bis as suggested. We have an initial 
>> implementation of LISP-GPE in OOR and we think this extension could be 
>> really useful.
>> 
>> Albert López
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> El 30/11/17 a les 07:32, Florin Coras ha escrit:
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> The LISP implementation in FD.io VPP makes use of it to distinguish between 
>>> Ethernet, IP and NSH payloads. 
>>> 
>>> Florin
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 10:20 PM, Victor Moreno (vimoreno) 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I’m strongly supportive of this proposal as it completes the necessary 
>>>> specifications to support the L2 services proposed in the eid-mobility 
>>>> draft.  
>>>> 
>>>> Victor
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Fabio Maino (fmaino) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> sounds good.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Fabio
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 11/29/17 3:13 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>>>>> I’d also add before the last sentence:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If the N-bit and V-bit are 0 when the P-bit is set, the middle 16-bits 
>>>>>> are set to 0.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dino
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Fabio Maino <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 11/29/17 3:05 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>>>>>>> How about this wording Fabio:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> P: The P-bit is the Next Protocol bit. When set, the low-order 8 bits 
>>>>>>>> is used for the Next Protocol field. When the N-bit is also set with 
>>>>>>>> the P-bit, the Nonce field is the middle 16 bits. When the V bit is 
>>>>>>>> also set with the P-bit, the Version field is the middle 16 bits. 
>>>>>>>> Details on Next Protocol field usage are described in 
>>>>>>>> [draft-lewis-lisp-gpe].
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Comments?
>>>>>>> much better.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Fabio
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dino
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 2:49 PM, Fabio Maino <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Definition of the P bit will look like:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>    P: The P-bit is the Next Protocol bit. When this bit is set to
>>>>>>>>>       1, Nonce length, when used, is limited to 16 bits and the lenght
>>>>>>>>>       of the Source and Destination Map-Version fields, when used, is 
>>>>>>>>> limited
>>>>>>>>>       to 8 bits. Refer to [draft-lewis-lisp-gpe] for more details.
>>>>>>>>>       The P-bit is set to 1 to indicate the presence of the 8 bit 
>>>>>>>>> Next Protocol field encoded as:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Do you think the overall proposed extension makes sense?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Fabio
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/17 2:38 PM, Fabio Maino wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/17 2:36 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The use of the P-bit is not compatible with the Map-Versioning 
>>>>>>>>>>>> feature, but an equivalent function can be specified (if needed) 
>>>>>>>>>>>> with a Next-Protocol shim header. I can add text to the LISP-GPE 
>>>>>>>>>>>> draft to reflect that.
>>>>>>>>>>> Well it could be. Just like you did with the Nonce field. Make the 
>>>>>>>>>>> Version field the middle 16-bits. So V and P can be set at the same 
>>>>>>>>>>> as well as N and P.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Dino
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Good point, shortening versions to 8 bits...
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Seems fine to me.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Fabio
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to