> On 23 Feb 2018, at 19:39, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > > It doesn’t make sense. As far as I can tell, RIG went through the same > subittal and review process. I certainly believe it was a product of the > working group. > > Can you tell me why it didn’t go through IETF last call?
It did not go through IETF last call because the authors (including you) asked to move it forward as individual submission. As such the process for its publication (as outlined in RFC4846) does not include any last call. In other words there was no formal consensus on the document hence it cannot be considered a WG document. I don’t think we can put the document in the WG page (despite being certainly an important piece of work) Ciao L. > > Dino > >> On Feb 23, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Joel Halpern Direct >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> No, I do not think it is appropriate to put it in the list (not sure if I >> can). >> >> LIG was produced as an Informational RFC by the LISP working group. it is a >> WG product. >> >> RFC 8112 was NOT produced by the LISP working group. It had been on our >> plate, and then was taken for publication to the Independent Stream. Which >> is fine. (Luigi and I were asked if this was a problem.) But that means it >> was not a working group product, did not go through IETF last call, and was >> not approved by the IESG. Formally, it is a product of the listed authors. >> >> Yours, >> Joel >> >> On 2/23/18 1:11 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >>> I don’t understand why its different than lig. Can you put it in the list? >>> Dino >>>> On Feb 23, 2018, at 9:55 AM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> It is not listed because it is not a working group product. It is an >>>> Independent Stream document from the authors. (I agree it is a useful >>>> document, but that is not whta that list is about.) >>>> >>>> Yours, >>>> Joel >>>> >>>> On 2/23/18 12:34 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >>>>> Chairs, can you check why RFC 8112 is not listed in the RFC list in >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lisp/documents/? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Dino >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> lisp mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
