-----Original Message-----
From: ila [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dino Farinacci
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 1:10 PM
To: Uma Chunduri <[email protected]>
Cc: David Meyer <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Tom Herbert
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; Paul Vinciguerra
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Ila] [lisp] LISP for ILA
> A. Scalability
> B. Security
> C. Privacy
> D. Dos/DDOS Prevention
>
> While one can relatively handle #A and #B IMO - #C* and #D are
still
> the hardest problems (despite all the research).
Was there a reason you singled out privacy and just didn’t include
it under security?
You can easily secure (origin auth, integrity protection, encryption,
protection from reply attacks etc) all on the wire stuff with matured protocols
from outside observers/from intermediate nodes in the network.
This is obviously not true w.r.t keeping the secured data anonymously. Remember
the argument, how your provider itself is compromised (all bets are off)??
A great reference to the privacy topic to me though:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6973
--
Uma C.
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
