Hi Suresh, That codepoint 6 is not permanently assigned (will expire in 04/2019). Furthermore, for that code to be permanently assigned a standard track document is required.
The text in the draft is correct. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : lisp [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Suresh Krishnan > Envoyé : jeudi 24 janvier 2019 04:59 > À : The IESG > Cc : [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Objet : [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis- > 02: (with COMMENT) > > Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-02: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * Section 5.1. LISP Packet Types > > "The values in the ranges 5-7 and 9-14 can be assigned via Standards Action > [RFC8126]." > > Since LISP-DDT already used up packet type 6 this text probably needs to get > updated. > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
