Sounds good to me Med. Thanks Suresh ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 2:46:37 AM To: Suresh Krishnan Cc: The IESG; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-02: (with COMMENT)
Hi Suresh, IMHO, Section 5.1 of 6833bis be updated to refer to the IANA registry rather than echoing it. Anyway, I updated the draft as follows: OLD: The values in the ranges 5-7 and 9-14 can be assigned via .. NEW: Values can be assigned via .. Thank you. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : jeudi 24 janvier 2019 20:20 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN > Cc : The IESG; [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-ietf-lisp- > [email protected] > Objet : Re: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp- > rfc8113bis-02: (with COMMENT) > > Hi Med, > > > On Jan 24, 2019, at 1:16 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Hi Suresh, > > > > That codepoint 6 is not permanently assigned (will expire in 04/2019). > Furthermore, for that code to be permanently assigned a standard track > document is required. > > > > The text in the draft is correct. > > I dug a little bit more and looks like both 5 and 6 are listed as taken in > draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-23 (Section 5.1) with only 7 being available. My > comment was non-blocking and I leave it up to you, the chairs, and the > responsible AD to figure out the right thing to do here. > > Thanks > Suresh
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
