I support moving this document to the standards track. Victor
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:51 AM Jordi Paillissé <[email protected]> wrote: > Support! > > Jordi > El 11/1/24 a les 18:34, Fabio Maino (fmaino) ha escrit: > > I support moving this document to standard track > > > > Fabio > > > > *From: *lisp <[email protected]> <[email protected]> on behalf of > Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Date: *Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 4:53 AM > *To: *LISP mailing list list <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track? > > Hi All, > > > > Happy new year! > > > > As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name encoding > document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track. > > > > Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change and > that deployment experience is added to the document. > > > > Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree with the > change. > > > > Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or you are > against. > > (Silence does not count) > > > > Please reply. > > > > Ciao > > > > L. > > > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > *From: *"Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)" > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > > *Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding* > > *Date: *December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1 > > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > > > > Hi all, > > > > The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name Encoding has been > posted. The document is in good shape and minor identified nits have been > fixed. Please find the review here: > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/ > > > > However, as part of the review, it was raised the question if the document > is in the right stream (currently in Experimental). Given that there are > known implementations of the spec and that it has been running in > production for some time, my suggestion is to consider moving this document > to Standards track instead. > > > > Thanks, > > Alberto > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing [email protected]https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
