** Sometime around 0:05 -0400 5/28/98, Adam Bailey sent everyone: >>I understand this means either AOL >>users don't read their mail too oftern (or AOL set their mailbox limit WAY >>too low), > >An AOL mailbox holds 550 messages. Why does this number strike me as amusing (in an RFC-821-kinda way)? ;-) __________________________________________________________________________ Vince Sabio Boy & His Sabre: <http://www.insane.net/tsc/Vince/> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stop Internet Spam! <http://www.cauce.org/> Vince's Interior Decorating Tip #37 (collect the whole series!): "If it's not spaghetti, it doesn't belong on the wall."
- AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Marcus
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Ken Hooper
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Vince Sabio
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? David W. Tamkin
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Lazlo Nibble
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? J. Philip Miller
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Bill Bogstad
- Re: AOL: more trouble than they're worth?? Adam Bailey
