>Having been on the receiving end of thousands of these, my observation >is that the documents which have had the most time lavished on their >appearance tend to be those with the least useful content, and vice versa. >In a perverse sort of way, this makes sense: someone who is trying to >decide between mauve and maroon for the subheaders is spending their >time on that instead of on proofreading, spellchecking, etc. > >---Rsk >Rich Kulawiec >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Even simple colored vertical lines distinguishing the various levels in [Re:][Re:]Replies is very helpful. Outlook, for example, uses it nicely within its HTML format. It is also more general as these "superior" signs which concerns message with fixed lines based on old 80 colums screens. Nicolas Brouard mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sauvy.ined.fr/~brouard
- Re: HTML in email to lists Nick Simicich
- Re: HTML in email to lists Russ Allbery
- RE: HTML in email to lists Tom Rouse
- Re: HTML in email to lists Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: HTML in email to lists Bernie Cosell
- Re: HTML in email to lists Lazlo Nibble
- Re: HTML in email to lists Dan Sugalski
- Re: HTML in email to lists Rich Kulawiec
- RE: HTML in email to lists Nicolas Brouard
- Re: HTML in email to lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML in email to lists Nicolas Brouard
- Re: HTML in email to lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML in email to lists Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
- Re: HTML in email to lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML in email to lists Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
- Re: HTML in email to lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML in email to lists Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: HTML in email to lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML in email to lists Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: HTML in email to lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML in email to lists Lazlo Nibble
