> Just like saying
> that the New York Times is the only possible definition for printed
> text stylistic designs. Taht's not even true in New York City, much
> less newspaper publishing, much less publishing in general.
Hey, Chuq, I don't have a copy of the New York Times at my desk, but
as I recall it uses several different type faces, in several sizes,
bold face, italics, and if you get to the feature sections, color and
other formatting features start to show up, too. Heck, I think they
even print COLOR pictures on the front page now.
In fact, the Times could even be used as a model for how to use
formatting features without getting carried away with them like USA Today
does. (IMHO, at least.)
Just because I don't have the tools to handle formatted text on my list
properly now, that doesn't mean I reject the concept forever.
I've seen the future, and it was bold faced.
--
Mike Nolan
