On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 11:22:22AM +0100, Nicolas Brouard wrote: > > I looked at the Mutt mailer which is yet another mailer (on Unix only and > not on X, look at www.mutt.org), very similar to pine (they recently added > IMAP); why all this lost of energy to have a similar product > instead of merging pine and lynx (both in source code) to have a modern > plain text mailer (modern meaning being able to decode HTML into plain > text). > I'm dissapointed at the inefficiency too. Not theirs. Yours. Why write a complaining letter about merging two source trees? Why didn't you DO it, and write to ANNOUNCE it? Quite frankly, I wouldn't use the resulting mailer unless you also embedded a JVM, a Perl interpreter, and an ASCII VRML renderer. -- John White [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key: http://www.triceratops.com/john/public-key.pgp
- Re: HTML in email to lists Joshua D. Baer
- Re: HTML in email to lists Info-LabVIEW List Maintainer
- Re: HTML in email to lists Stephanie da Silva
- Re: HTML in email to lists Mike Nolan
- RE: HTML in email to lists Nicolas Brouard
- RE: HTML in email to lists Daniel Reed
- RE: HTML in email to lists Nicolas Brouard
- RE: HTML in email to lists SRE
- RE: HTML in email to lists Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
- RE: HTML in email to lists Bernie Cosell
- Re: HTML in email to lists johnjohn
- Re: HTML in email to lists Russ Allbery
- Re: Size of HTML vs plainte... Nicolas Brouard
- Re: HTML in email to lists Tim Bowden
- Re: HTML in email to lists Info-LabVIEW List Maintainer
- Re: HTML in email to lists Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: HTML in email to lists Mike Nolan
- Re: HTML in email to lists Anthony J. Albert
- Re: HTML in email to lists Anthony J. Albert
- Re: HTML in email to lists Mike Nolan
