On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 11:23:07PM -0400, Tim Pierce wrote:
> What they are claiming is permission to use messages posted on lists
> they host, and that you can't take this permission away from them.
They are claiming a good deal more than that (the right to create derivative
works in any and all media for starters). I don't have a problem with them
setting up an agreement that gives them legal protection to provide the
service they're providing: distributing and archiving mailing list messages.
Unfortunately they are drawing a much wider circle than that.
--
Lazlo Nibble - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.studio-nibble.com
this message powered by level 42 - running in the family
--
- Re: eGroup - What's with the clause? Bernie Cosell
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... Tim Bowden
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... John R Levine
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... murr rhame
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... Tim Bowden
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Claus... murr rhame
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity ... Tim Bowden
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity ... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Claus... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... Tim Pierce
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Claus... Ernie Longmire/Lazlo Nibble
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity ... Istvan Berkeley
- Re: eGroup - the San... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the San... John R Levine
- Re: eGroup - the San... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the San... Tim Pierce
- Re: eGroup - the San... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the San... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the San... Tim Pierce
- Re: eGroup - the San... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: eGroup - the Sanity Clause... Bernie Cosell
