At 8:55 PM -0400 8/12/99, John R Levine wrote:
> Hi, it's me again. I think this argument is backward -- I agree that list
> members can't place wierd restrictions on their individual messages, but in
> this case eGroups is demanding from the list owner rights that it's not at
> all clear that any of his list members have assigned him.
If you sign up for a list that has those licenses attached, then you
are by your agreeing to be a part of it agreeing to the licenses.
It'd be different if those licenses were added retroactively, but if
you sign up for a list, you're agreeing to abide by the list rules,
no? So I don't see this as an issue -- a user voluntarily agrees to
the licenses by signing up (and ignorance or refusing to read the
rules doesn't count as a reason to invalidate them....)
chuq
--
Chuq Von Rospach (Hockey fan? <http://www.plaidworks.com/hockey/>)
Apple Mail List Gnome (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Plaidworks Consulting (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
<http://www.plaidworks.com/> + <http://www.lists.apple.com/>
The Jedi that I admire most met up with Darth Maul and now he's toast...
(Weird Al Yankovic - The Saga Begins)
