> > Executive summary: I need a mandate.
>
> As for myself, I think ruby/epic is a much more interesting and potentially
> groundbreaking direction. While I do have a lot of effort invested in
> my ircii-based scripts for epic4, I imagine they could be reimplemented
> in ruby in about 1/8th of the code and with a much nicer design. I'm willing
> to do that when the time comes.
I think I would also agree with that option, though I don't recall hearing
about ruby prior to this email thread. The ircII language has too many
limitations for my taste, and I have toyed with the idea of implementing my
own client so that I could use a more complete and (hopefully) more efficient
language...of course, I don't have the time, and hop is a good coder, so...
--
Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list
