>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Didn't Bandai do something similar when they announced the MG Z'Gok?  I
think they displayed some scratch built models from Hobby Japan to show what
it could potentially look like.  I think we will probably see a MG based on
the concept drawings in the background.  The 2 models on display are just
there to show what the potential might be. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

That makes the most sense.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
They will probably keep the lineart look of TurnA and reconn an inner frame
to it (like the changes to RX-78's supposed monocoque design, let's not get
into that one again!).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I wonder how they will handle the knew poseability without retroconning it
too much...


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
TurnA is an interesting choice, to say the least.  If they take the approach
of Hobby Japan and move it more towards a mainstream Gundam design, it could
be interesting. 

I am surprised they tied the TurnA release to the 100th MG, one would of
thought the DVD release last year would have been a better time for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I like the Turn A, and even the retrocon, but I would just as soon get the
vanilla version too.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
While the last few MG releases have been interesting (Crossbone(s), Strike
Freedom, V2 bad guys, Hi-Nu) these releases don't seem to have generate the
same fanfare as the earlier release.  I don't see a lot excitement on the
web about these.  In a lot of ways, I feel the current generation of MG are
over-engineered, making them too expensive and not very suitable to
customization, which the die-hard modelers always do. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Personally I like the new engineering.  The price isn't that much over the
version 1 kits.  I think there are still lots of room for customizations.
The difference is that now customization is more for aesthetics instead of
compensating for engineering flaws.
--------------------------------------------------
The Gundam Mailing List MK-II [email protected]

Archives: http://www.gundam.com/gml
    Help: Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this in
          the BODY: help list

Reply via email to