Hi Stef,
I know that there are many who would
support a public interest constituency.
My question was really the opposite --
is there anyone who feels that there
should *not* be a public interest
constituency?
If so, why?
Jay.
At 1/31/99, 12:28 AM, Einar Stefferud wrote:
>Please check for me to make sure that my 10 constituency proposal
>still includes a public interest constituency! I belive it was there
>in MTY and in all the versions since, so please check to be sure I
>have not somehow removed it with some weird key strokes!
>
>Cheers...\Stef
>
>From your message Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:13:25 -0500:
>}>This is why I continue to be for the flat membership.
>}
>}If we ignore the question of membership model,
>}and we assume a constituency based Names Council,
>}are there any objections to adding a public
>}interest constituency?
>}
>}Jay.
>}
>
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
