Jay and all,
Yes Jay, we do not support ANY constituencies to be defined as part of
a membership or NC seats. We do not because as I have stated
several times before they only promote infighting, constituencies by
there nature create political confusion and promote a "us against them"
contention situation, are confusing in determining which constituency
does any one person fit into?, Ect, Ect.........
Jay Fenello wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> I know that there are many who would
> support a public interest constituency.
>
> My question was really the opposite --
> is there anyone who feels that there
> should *not* be a public interest
> constituency?
>
> If so, why?
>
> Jay.
>
> At 1/31/99, 12:28 AM, Einar Stefferud wrote:
> >Please check for me to make sure that my 10 constituency proposal
> >still includes a public interest constituency! I belive it was there
> >in MTY and in all the versions since, so please check to be sure I
> >have not somehow removed it with some weird key strokes!
> >
> >Cheers...\Stef
> >
> >From your message Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:13:25 -0500:
> >}>This is why I continue to be for the flat membership.
> >}
> >}If we ignore the question of membership model,
> >}and we assume a constituency based Names Council,
> >}are there any objections to adding a public
> >}interest constituency?
> >}
> >}Jay.
> >}
> >
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
