At 08:13 AM 2/2/99 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Another observation might be that the much maligned and
>disliked NSI dispute policy might actually discourage


Chuck,

It MIGHT cause all sorts of effects.  Some of them MIGHT be 
constructive.  Some MIGHT be devastating.

Hypothesizing about consequences is, perhaps, an enjoyable source of 
distraction, but it is an utterly empty exercise, absent data which moves 
the conjecture from might to does.

In the absence of substantiating data, therefore, your conjectures do not 
in any way alter the fact that NSI has placed itself in a position of 
giving additional rights to trademark holders, beyond that granted by the 
courts.

d/

ps.  Since you acknowledge that you substantiating your guesses would be 
difficult, one MIGHT try to guess why you are offering such 'might's, 
rather than attend to the objective facts of NSI's policy.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker                                       Tel: +60 (19) 3299 445
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>             Post Office Box 296, U.P.M.
                                         Serdang, Selangor 43400  MALAYSIA
Brandenburg Consulting
<http://www.brandenburg.com>                       Tel: +1 (408) 246 8253
Fax: +1(408)273 6464             675 Spruce Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94086  USA

Reply via email to