Re: NSI discouraging things (was RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats)

[Bill Lovell]

At 06:38 PM 2/2/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Carl Oppedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>One must not forget that Mr. Gomes has an advantage over all of the
>>rest of us -- he is with NSI, which conducts these "invocations" in
>>fiercely protected secrecy.  If the public could review these
>>"invocations" the way it can study the actions of ordinary courts,
>>the public could consider whether the invocations were fair or not,
>>and whether they do or do not discourage things.
>
>I agree with this assessment, and would like to call upon NSI to
>disclose its rulings to the public.  If NSI is to act with the powers
>of a court, then it should be held to the standards that courts are
>held to, in my opinion.
>

As is currently being learned by Bill Gates, when you find yourself
in court then all your dirty linen DOES come out!

Bill Lovell

http://cerebalaw.com