William X. Walsh a �crit:
> It should also be pointed out the Mr Sondow was one of the most vocal supporters
> of the DNSO.org process,
I supported the process when it was a good one. I was one of the
participants, like Eberhard Lisse, Bill Semitch, Nii Quaynor, Ricardo Sawon,
Daniel Kaplan,and many, many others. I never had anything to do with the
leadership.
> even to the point of attacking those who criticized the process.
Of course I attacked stupid, arrogant people like you, who never had
anything to do with the work the DNSO.org did, understand nothing about it,
but think they can shoot their mouths off in public.
> Mr Sondow only relatively recently began criticizing the DNSO.org, I
> suspect because he saw that a lot of what was being said about > DNSO.org's
>leadership was true. For someone who was such a proud
> and loud supporter of the DNSO.org to have now endorsed a different > draft speaks
>volumes.
I was and am proud to have participated in Monterrey in the drafting of a
fine consensus document. When that document was altered, by a few people in
the leadership, without the consent of the participants, I condemned that
action. I have been honest and consistent throughout. Unlike you, who have
never had the decency to learn what's going on before making your idiot
pronoucements.
> I myself at first supported the DNSO.org process, and encouraged people to give
> them the benefit of the doubt, and even criticized those who immediately jumped
> to conclusions because it was a CORE/ITU sponsored process. I praised what I
> saw were attempts to be truly representative. I supported it after Barcelona
> and even after Monterrey.
You? You never had the slightest thing to do with it. Do you think anyone
gives a damn what you think, you bloated, self-important twit?
