That is what we will be doing tomorrow night, when we post a whole lot of
items for public comment before our Singapore meeting, most notably the
draft registrar accreditation guidelines and the two DNSO proposals. Have at
them!
To quote from your next message (Paris draft ----> items for comment): "All
arguments at this point about the process for birthing the items for comment
are pretty much MOOT, unles you are just trying to negate the progress that
they represent."
Esther
At 01:39 PM 07/02/99 -0800, Einar Stefferud wrote:
>Hi Esther -- A respectful suggest:
>
>Why not presnt the community with a list of things that ICANN is
>uncertain about and let us help generate some certainty;-????
>
>Or at least provide helpful (though maybe noisy) disucssion of the
>related issues. WE see no reason for you and the BoD to suffer
>through all this in the dark.
>
>In fact, we are asking that you throw back the room darkening drapes
>and let the sunshine in;-)...
>
>So, let us help you, instead of keeping us in the dark too. It is
>really hard to trust what we cannot see. And learning that you are
>also in the dark does not help to build trust.
>
>Cheers...\Stef
>
>>From your message Sun, 7 Feb 1999 14:31:19 -0500:
>}
>}FWIW, I'm genuinely interested. I am trying not to throw my (ICANN's
>}imputed) weight around, to the extent we have any, so I try to stay brief.
>}I want to urge the conversation on, not take it over. And I don't try to
>}answer things to which there are no answers. There's a lot we/I simply
>}don't know, haven't decided, etc. I try not to take myself too seriously,
>}but to take this process seriously.
>}
>}Esther
>}
>}
>}At 07:30 AM 07/02/99 -0500, Dan Steinberg wrote:
>}>Cutting things down a bit in an attempt to have pity on your in-box:
>}>
>}> In a public reply to your request, Einar Stefferud of ORSC said:
>}>
>}>> Ask Esther for the complete collection of all her mail to the net and
>}>> read it all for tone and read it between the lines and ask yourself if
>}>> you think she is genuainely interested in the discussion, or just
>}>> trying to shut it down as soon as possible? This is my hypthesis, and
>}>> if in your judgement, after researching them all, you find that I am
>}>> off base, please inform me and the rest of the net of your evaluation.
>}>
>}>Actually, the real problem may not be Esther. I think itt is the
>}>impression we get from *all* of the people speaking for ICANN (Mike
>}>Roberts in his interim role, the BoD declarations and participation
>}>(or not) on various lists and... and how Esther's comments layer over
>}>the top of it). To be fair (and to fix whatever problem ther may be)
>}>her words alone should not be taken out of context.
>}>
>}>
>}>
>}>Dan Steinberg
>}>
>}>SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
>}>35, du Ravin
>}>Box 532, RR1 phone: (613) 794-5356
>}>Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
>}>J0X 1N0 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>}>
>}
>}
>}Esther Dyson Always make new mistakes!
>}chairman, EDventure Holdings
>}interim chairman, Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & Numbers
>}[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>}1 (212) 924-8800
>}1 (212) 924-0240 fax
>}104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
>}New York, NY 10011 USA
>}http://www.edventure.com
>}
>}PC Forum: 21 to 24 March 1999, Scottsdale (Phoenix), Arizona
>}High-Tech Forum in Europe: 24 to 26 October 1999, Budapest
>}Book: "Release 2.0: A design for living in the digital age"
>}
>}
>
Esther Dyson Always make new mistakes!
chairman, EDventure Holdings
interim chairman, Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & Numbers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 (212) 924-8800
1 (212) 924-0240 fax
104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
New York, NY 10011 USA
http://www.edventure.com
PC Forum: 21 to 24 March 1999, Scottsdale (Phoenix), Arizona
High-Tech Forum in Europe: 24 to 26 October 1999, Budapest
Book: "Release 2.0: A design for living in the digital age"
