Eric Weisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I do not believe the "general public" has any interest in joining >our group nor in voting for our board. Thus, there must be some >other way of protecting their interests. Perhaps there should be >a "public interest" SO (given that "we" have chosen the SO >structure to address such concerns). But, we will never >accomplish that purpose through automatic registration or >inscription. We will only increase the burdens of management and >the potential of manipulation. I support the creation of a public interest, or netizens SO, if you like. --gregbo
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN? Eric Weisberg
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN? Jonathan Zittrain
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN... Eric Weisberg
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of I... Greg Skinner
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic ... Diane Cabell
- Re: [Membership] The People's Repu... Eric Weisberg
- Re: [Membership] The People's ... Ken Freed
- Re: [Membership] The Peopl... William X. Walsh
- Re: [Membership] The Peopl... Bill Lovell
- Re: [Membership] The Peopl... William X. Walsh
- Re: [Membership] The Peopl... Michael Sondow
- Re: [Membership] The Peopl... William X. Walsh
- Re: [Membership] The Peopl... Bill Lovell
- Re: [Membership] The Peopl... Greg Skinner
