At 01:39 AM 2/9/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Bill Lovell a �crit:
>
>> >The fact is that until something happens that directly affects them and
that
>> >they feel they can be an activist about, they will not get involved. And
>> >history tends to indicate that most of those who get involved in such a
>> >fashion, tend to get involved only for the short term, and drop off once
>their
>> >problem is either solved, or it becomes obvious that their problem will
>not be
>> >solved by their participation.
>> >
>> Concur with all of the above from Mr. Walsh. Just look at U. S. National
>> elections: turnout 35% at best?
>> See below.
>
>These are no more than self-serving lies told by people who are so insecure
>that they fear extinction of their own weak voices in the mass.
>The public is involved in every facet of life, from local community boards
>deciding what is done in their neighborhoods, to police review boards, to
>nationwide public review councils overseeing telecommunications and
>satellite service. And there will be public review of the ICANN and the
>Internet, whether Mssrs. Walsh and Lovell and Weisberg like it or not.
And where did I say there would not be? Because I concurred with a
small part of what Mr. Walsh had to say? And who is Weisberg?
And, more importantly, where is the guy who said that Sondow's
harsh mouth had been toned down? Have I got a bulletin for him!
Bill Lovell
