In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Sondow writes:
> Dr Eberhard W Lisse a =E9crit:
>
> > Please, post to the list of record ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with cc to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]), who on behalf of ISOC, made what input into the DNSO
> > process, in particular DNSO.ORG, when, using which forum, and where is
> > this documented (minutes of meetings, archies of lists, copies of emails)?
> This is the trouble with organizations. One or two people who, for
> whatever personal reason, support something, then claim that they
> represent hundreds or thousands of others. But, where are the
> others? I haven't seen them or heard from them. If there are
> hundreds of ISOC members who support the CORE/INTA draft, why
> weren't they at Monterrey, or Washington, or on the mailing lists
> collaborating in the discussions about drafting the proposals? This
> sort of nonsense is precisely what keeps the ICIIU from becoming a
> membership organization. Too many abuses. In the end, people must
> speak for themselves and, if they don't, their voice just doesn't
> count.
Mr Sola has never, ever indicated he mad any statement on behalf of
ISOC, only for his lobby group.
Ms St.Amour has neither, to my knowledge, mad any statement on behalf
of ISOC.
And neither are on the ISOC board if I am not mistaken.
I remain unconvinced that there has been any input from ISOC until I
see a reply to my above request.
greetings, el
