Roeland
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Roeland M.J. Meyer" writes:
> There are some things that are different from the BMW draft and they
> have enough merit to garner some impressive support, over the BMW
> draft.
PLEASE, it's not a BMW draft. It is Kent's/INTA Draft. It has almost
no support from BM.
> The only way out is a gap analysis and some creative negotiating
> towards a solutions matrix. It appears that, with the possible
> exception of the trademark interests, the rest of the community is
> willing to go down that road, are you?
> Most of the significant leaders have spoken in favour of this
> approach, will you lead, follow, or get out of the way?
There are two options, let ICANN decide or compromise between
Kent's/INTA Draft and the Paris Draft. (and for the letter option,
there are two suboptions, get DNSO.ORG to designate someone who is
willing to negotiate in good faith, or what do you need Kent for
anyway, take out what we think is useable and write a BMWP Draft that
deserves its name.
el
